Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Debate Over Prayer in Public Schools


     

Separation of Church and State

Since 1948, the debate over pray in public schools has been challenged in the United States court systems.  In two landmark decisions- Engel v. Vitale, which was on June 25, 1962 and Abington School District v. Schempp, on June 17, 1963- The Supreme Court declared school sponsored prayer and Bible readings as unconstitutional. The case of Engel v. Vitale put an end to a New York city school’s required prayer, at the start of the day and Engel v. Vitale set a precedent for future cases. In Abington School District v. Schempp, the court declared school sponsored Bible readings and the recitation of the Lord’s prayer as unconstitutional.  



There are several reasons why prayer should be in public schools:

-Even though the United States Supreme court banned school-sponsored prayer in public schools over 50 years ago, most Americans agree that prayer should be in schools.  Most Americans support allowing students to pray in public school classrooms.  A new Gallup shows that 61 percent of Americans are in favor of allowing daily prayer to be spoken in the classroom. 

-Prayer in schools would help instill morality and help combat issues in our society such as school shootings, bullying, increased drug use, alcoholism, teen pregnancy, and sexual promiscuity.

-Allowing prayer in school has the ability to transform communities. There would be a reduction in violence and we’ll see families and communities restored. 

-Prayer in schools would help nurture a child’s soul and reinforce the values that are being taught or not being taught in the home and in our communities.   

-Prayer in schools can help guide students to make the right decisions and to make better choices throughout their school years.  

-Prayer in schools would allow faith based students to have an opportunity to observe their religious beliefs during the day.   

There are several reasons why prayer does not belong in public schools:

-It would violate the Constitution. 

-It would not be fair or just.  Most of those advocating for pray in schools are advocating for Christian prayer.  If Christian pray were allowed in schools, then prayer of other religions (Muslim, Buddhist, Jewish and Hindu, etc.) should be allowed, as well.

-It would place a burden on the schools.  Teaching and monitoring religion is not the purpose of public schools and the staff are not trained to do this.

-Some believe the place for prayer and religious instruction is in the home, the church, the synagogue and the mosque, etc.  and it is the responsibility of the parent to educate their children on religious matters and not the schools responsibility.

-Individuals who advocate for prayer in school, may have less then Christian reasons for their advocacy; reasons like getting elected or re-elected to public office by sincere, but uninformed voters.

No comments:

Post a Comment